Before getting you teeth stuck into the meat of my opinions below, I'd suggest that anyone who is taking our class view the following video from the time counter 16:16 as teacher, author, illustrator and artists Pete Loveday eloquently covers the subject of both aura and Kitsch.
Celebrated designers
strive to turn a mundane object into something that is pleasing to the eye, thus
increasing its commercial viability. What the best designers intend for their
creations be it for an example Corbussier’s architecture, Terrance Conran’s furniture
or the high-tech gadgets designed by Johny Ive is not to make grandiose fine
art, but something that is aesthetically pleasing to the paying public. Design
school teaches its pupils to make what Clement Greenburg would describe as
kitsch. Art that is not the result of the artist’s free expression, but commissioned
for the sole purpose of using beauty, shape and color to sell more product. Thankfully
society has since elevated kitsch to such a highly respected level that across
the world there are now museums dedicated not to Fine Art, but its commercial cousin;
Design. (Singapore’s Red Dot, the Bauhaus in Berlin and the Design Museum in
London just to name a few)
Advertising is the epitome
of Clement Greenbergs’ definition of kitsch; Being a commercial transaction
made between the manufacturer of a product who wants to see a rise in the number
of sales of their merchandise and a design team who has been paid by that manufacturer
to make another product that has the sole purpose of persuading the public to
purchase the manufacturer’s product. In order to be successful in any of the visual
medias such as bill board posters, or television and film the advert has to be
designed to elicit a direct response from the viewer by catching the eye of its
target audience, the visual design and its message has to stand out from other competing
adverts, it has to tell a convincing story be it true or false about the
product that is has been commissioned to sell while bestowing certain characteristics
upon the companies brand. If misused for a political purpose it can be seen as extremely
similar to the fascist propaganda that Clement Greenberg wrote about. There is
also very little to differentiate between modern capitalists commissioning advertising
agents and the Christian authorities that have historically commissioned artists
to install church art that had the sole purpose of selling the bible’s religious
messages to their congregants. There is a distinctly beautiful irony that Brothers
Charles and Maurice Saatchi have become King makers in the upper echelons of modern
art, because for the last 50 years they have together been among Europe’s
most successful advertisers. By selling their talent for creating Kitsch they
have been able to acquire one of the world’s greatest private collections of
fine art. Their combined purchasing power and influence has made famous the
names of many emerging artists.
The Saatchi brothers own a number of websites,
their premiere website is their advertising website: http://saatchi.com/en-us/ while their art gallery
website is: https://www.saatchiart.com/
A Saatchi and Saatchi
advert
https://media-assets-05.thedrum.com/cache/images/thedrum-prod/s3-news-tmp-90538-1_0--2x1--940.png
Artwork displayed at the Saatchi and Saatchi museum.
Civilisation Bai Yilu 2007



I have to reply to two comments by the end of the day to finish the homework assignment and as it's Sunday 04:33pm and no one has commented I'll reply to my non existent comments; First "No I don't know if there is anything better than this bit of homework, but if there is I want it caught and shot now." Second "I could teach you, but I'd have to charge."
ReplyDelete